Four points, one Monday night and a father's rule: Dandy are 4-3 and the Annihilators come to them next

Melanie Patterson would not count it. Dandy had led the Inexperienced Blitz since Sunday night, the margin was thinner than it looked, and Dallas Goedert still had a game to play in Philadelphia.

Melanie Patterson would not count it. Dandy had led the Inexperienced Blitz since Sunday night, the margin was thinner than it looked, and Dallas Goedert still had a game to play in Philadelphia. I asked her on Monday afternoon how she watches a lead like that.

"The way my father taught me: it isn't won until the last man has played," she told me. "Twelve points is a lot for a tight end, but it isn't impossible, so I'll watch it and I won't count it before it's over."

Goedert played. He scored 7.3. By the time the Cowboys had finished off the Eagles, Dandy had a 110.58 to 106.26 win, the two-game skid was over and Dandy were 4-3.

Four points is not much room, and I keep coming back less to the number than to the owner who refused to spend it early. Read again after the final, her answer sounded less like caution than like a rule she has lived by for a long time. That is my reading, not hers. She gave me one sentence about her father and moved on.

Here is the part of her answer I have been chewing on, because it was aimed, politely, at me.

For two weeks I have kept a watch on Chris Olave and Tyler Allgeier. Sunday did not help them in my notebook: Joe Burrow and Tee Higgins carried the scoring again, and the receiver and the running back were quiet behind them. I asked Patterson what would make her look at those spots.

"Chris Olave is my receiver, and one quiet afternoon from a healthy starter isn't a reason to move him," she said. "Same with Tyler. What makes me look at a spot is a man getting hurt or losing his snaps on the field, not one box score."

I have been judging those two by the scoreboard. She judges them by the field: are they healthy, are they on it. Her rule is one a reporter can check. Mine, frankly, bends to fit whatever column I have half-written. Last week I conceded in print that the quarterback debate I built was mine and not hers. This week I'll concede something smaller and more useful. I am going to hold her to her standard instead of mine. If Olave or Allgeier gets hurt or starts losing snaps, I will ask again, and loudly. Until then, a quiet afternoon is a quiet afternoon.

She has already told me who she wants to see next. "We have three good players on byes, so I want the next men up to do their jobs, the way Colston did at the flex on Sunday," she said. Loveland gave her the third-best score on the roster from that flex spot. Next men up is not a slogan for Dandy this week. It is the lineup.

One loose end from my own notebook is now tied. Last week I watched Grover Stewart working as the third man in the defensive line rotation and wrote that I didn't know how he had got there. My colleague Trevor Banks went to the league's public record for me: Stewart signed with Dandy as a free agent on Tuesday, Oct. 20, the same day I first saw him in that rotation. No trade, nobody going the other way. Patterson had already told me the rest of it: Stewart is "my third man on the line, which is what I brought him in for," beside Leonard Williams and Maxx Crosby.

That line may matter more than anything on offense this week, and the Annihilators are the reason.

They arrive at 2-5 after a lopsided loss to the Dragons, which would tempt you to call them finished. Rachel Stone, who covers them, won't, and I trust her eye on that team more than I trust a scoreboard. She calls them boom-or-bust, an offense that leans on Kirk Cousins through the air and D'Andre Swift near the goal line, and she would not call a turn on one big week and one bad one. What Dandy should fear, in her view, is not Sunday's version. It is the one that put up 118.82 in Week 6. If Cousins gets time, she wrote me, that offense can put up 100-plus, and Dandy should treat Week 8 as a game the Annihilators have nothing to lose in.

Trevor goes a step further, and he says it is his opinion: the line decides this one. A front that makes a boom-or-bust offense work for every yard, he told me, is the best answer to it.

I think they are both right. Burrow and Higgins carried the Blitz game. With three good players on byes, the Annihilators game looks like one the defense will have to carry for stretches, and that is where Stewart's job stops being a curiosity in my notebook and becomes the story.

Dandy are a game behind the Crimson Tide and the Wild Cards, both 5-2, with a trip to the Tide waiting in Week 9. Lose at home to a 2-5 team and that trip becomes a rescue mission. Win, and it stays a chase.

My lean is Dandy at home, not comfortably, and I'll be watching the line before I watch the box score. Patterson, as usual, put the whole week in fewer words than I just did.

"Win at home. That's all."